<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CJ Davide&#8217;s dissenting in People vs. Salarza (Rape)</title>
	<link>http://www.bingguanzon.com/97/cj-davides-dissenting-in-people-vs-salarza-rape</link>
	<description>Weblog by Rowena "Bing" Guanzon</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 02:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Bing</title>
		<link>http://www.bingguanzon.com/97/cj-davides-dissenting-in-people-vs-salarza-rape#comment-18656</link>
		<dc:creator>Bing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 02:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bingguanzon.com/97/cj-davides-dissenting-in-people-vs-salarza-rape#comment-18656</guid>
		<description>noel, silvino did get away with it. he was in jail while the trial was ongoing, convicted by the trial court and the court of appeals.

unfortunately, he was acquitted by the supreme court so he must be there by the seashore somewhere. isn't that scary?

SJ Davide dissented with the majority opinion of the supreme court, penned by justice Joshua Bellosillo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>noel, silvino did get away with it. he was in jail while the trial was ongoing, convicted by the trial court and the court of appeals.</p>
<p>unfortunately, he was acquitted by the supreme court so he must be there by the seashore somewhere. isn&#8217;t that scary?</p>
<p>SJ Davide dissented with the majority opinion of the supreme court, penned by justice Joshua Bellosillo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noel</title>
		<link>http://www.bingguanzon.com/97/cj-davides-dissenting-in-people-vs-salarza-rape#comment-3383</link>
		<dc:creator>noel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2006 04:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bingguanzon.com/97/cj-davides-dissenting-in-people-vs-salarza-rape#comment-3383</guid>
		<description>gee, and after reading the first part i thought silvino got away with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gee, and after reading the first part i thought silvino got away with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mae</title>
		<link>http://www.bingguanzon.com/97/cj-davides-dissenting-in-people-vs-salarza-rape#comment-793</link>
		<dc:creator>mae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 08:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bingguanzon.com/97/cj-davides-dissenting-in-people-vs-salarza-rape#comment-793</guid>
		<description>if silvino had not disclosed his identity amidst the copulation, he would have gone away with it without being known that it was him, but then sometimes, the order of things will always find its track back.
 
The woman's mistake in good faith may be what saved her from losing the case, but it would not save her from public scrutiny.

bottomline is, you should still not engage in premarital sex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if silvino had not disclosed his identity amidst the copulation, he would have gone away with it without being known that it was him, but then sometimes, the order of things will always find its track back.</p>
<p>The woman&#8217;s mistake in good faith may be what saved her from losing the case, but it would not save her from public scrutiny.</p>
<p>bottomline is, you should still not engage in premarital sex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
